This website is for sale! Contact us for more info.

Was Binance Really Hacked Losing 7,000  Bitcoin in a Single Transaction?


Obviously, everyone’s eyes in the crypto world today are pointed to Binance, amid the announced hack of 7,000 bitcoin or nearly $40 million worth of Bitcoin. Quickly conspiracy theories started to build up implying that the occurrence probably might not have been really a hack.

Unclear Statements from Binance

Tuesday, Binance, the largest crypto exchange in the world, announced that it was hacked losing 7,000 BTC which are worth around $40 million at the actual bitcoin price

They clearly state in the announcement that the security breach did not target Binance’s safety measures, but instead had the clients as a target:

“Hackers were able to obtain a large number of user API keys, 2FA codes, and potentially other info. The hackers used a variety of techniques, including phishing, viruses and other attacks. We are still concluding all possible methods used. There may also be additional affected accounts that have not been identified yet.”

What the above statement actually means is that Binance itself was not hacked but hackers were able to obtain sensitive data directly from users, which later was used to steal the funds.

The official announcement additionally says that all the 7,000 BTC that was stolen from the exchange was sent out in a single transaction  explaining how that happened:

“The transaction is structured in a way that passed our existing security checks. It was unfortunate that we were not able to block this withdrawal before it was executed.”

The announcement does not explain why they were unable to block this withdrawal and what was so special about its structure.

What about Binance Withdrawal Limits and KYC?

Binance has 3 levels of verification. The first level allows users to withdraw 2BTC, the second allows 100 BTC and the third is customizable for large user accounts.

For the first level users, to withdraw 2 BTC, no verification is needed. For the second level Binance requires a lot of documents from the users to raise for them the withdrawal limit to 100 BTC. For the third level, the verification process must be more complex than level 2.

So how could be possible that such a large single transaction, like the one in the security breach announcement above, passed undetected by Binance security systems?!

In addition, the supposed hacker that was clever enough to hack whales on Binance, then he sent the stolen BTC  to SegWit addresses where funds ane not spendable, adding more questions without an answer to the matter.

What are your thoughts about the Binance hack? Feel free to post it in the comments below.

Edit: The claim about the BTC being unspendable revealed to be incorrect,  and some funds were moved from the SegWit addresses.


About Author

Ethan Hunt

Bitcoin Maximalist and Toxic to our banking and monetary system. Separation of money and state is necessary just like the separation of religion and state in the past. Also, pro-local, pro-global and anti-national.

Disclaimer: All content found on is only for informational purposes and should not be considered as financial advice. Do your own research before making any investment. Use information at your own risk.


  1. Avatar
    Kre8tivkulture on

    Company funded hacker. They didn’t want the money,it was about making a statement. Obviously done by a company who stands to lose something

  2. Avatar
    Johnny Bravo on

    Why can’t they spend the stolen funds sent to SegWit addresses ?
    Thanks for educating us.

  3. Ethan Hunt
    Ethan Hunt on

    When you send Bitcoin to a SegWit address (which starts with “bc1…”) you need to send it from a type of address that can pack that information correctly so when the BTC arrives in the destination can be transferred again. Otherwise, funds will get stuck there forever.

Leave A Reply

As Featured In